In the previous post we have seen that C23 will provide us with tools for efficient overflow check for arithmetic. When discussing this, several people have asked why these tools do not provide a specific model to handle overflow, such as aborting or raising a signal. The answer to this is actually quite simple:
There is no commonly agreed strategy to handle overflow.
So for the C committee (and for the gcc feature this is based upon) there was no obvious choice for a strategy. Instead, the features provide the basics to implement any such strategy based on policy decisions that will be dependent on application specific settings, be they technical or cultural
Continue reading “Dealing with overflow”
As you might have noticed, C23 is scheduled to come out in November 2023 and will have a lot of improvements and new features, in particular for integers. One of the most controversial properties of integer arithmetic in C is the overflow behavior. C23 will have a new header
<stdckdint.h> for “checked integer operations”, that helps to deal with overflow and puts the responsibility in your hands, the programmer. In addition to the result of an arithmetic operation, the interfaces provide an extra
bool value that tells if the operation has been erroneous or not.
The addition that has been integrated into C23 is the core proposal and
some amendments. The history of this looks a bit confusing because later editions of the paper have removed parts that had already been adopted.
Anyhow, for many of you it is even possible to use these features in a C23 compatible way just now, because they are closely modeled after similar gcc and clang features. Since overflow still is an important source of bugs and security issues, you should just
start using checked integer operations, now!
Continue reading “Checked integer arithmetic in the prospect of C23”
The upcoming standard C23 has a lot of additions to the C library clause. Most of them are small, some of them are big but optional. I have now finished a first version of a document that summarizes many of the changes. It has some general discussions about the following subjects
and then lists changes to individual header files of the C library.
This does not contain an detailed description of the changes to the
math.h header. First, I am really not an expert on that, and second the changes there are quite invasive and we don’t have a diff-file that would clearly list them.
In the previous post https://gustedt.wordpress.com/2020/12/14/a-defer-mechanism-for-c/ I already presented an idea for a defer feature for C, namely a feature that would provide a simple mechanism to cleanup at the end of a block, regardless how that block is left. There are many different extension out there that provide such a feature, for example POSIX’
__finally and gcc’s
cleanup attribute. Although they are used quite often, none of these extension has yet been adopted widely enough to prefer it over the others for standardization.
In a new paper
A simple defer feature for C
we present a much simpler version of a unifying framework for such cleanup features which is conditionned to the acceptance of lambdas into C23:
Continue reading “A defer feature using lambda expressions”
Among the other new proposals for C23 that WG14 received are two brilliant gems by Alex Gilding
The first is probably what you’d expect if you know the C++ feature and how it started (I think in C++11), namely a possibility to specify constants for any type (if used to declare an object) or to have simple function calls that can be forced to be evaluated at compile time. There are still some rough edges to cut (storage class, linkage) but basically, if Wg14 weren’t so predictably unpredictable, this should be a homerun.
The other one is on a whole different level, eye opening and very, very promissing. Its main idea is to add annotations to APIs to avoid breaking ABIs and code duplication at the same time.
Continue reading “type-safe parametric polymorphism”
The dust is now settling and we finally should have all proposals for new C23 features. Below you find links to some of the newer ones that I co-authored. Many previous proposals are still open because WG14 only voted in favor and now they have to be revisted before they can be decided.
This is a new paper that appeared today on the site of the C committee:
C already has a variaty of interfaces for type-generic programming, but lacks a systematic approach that provides type safety, strong ecapsulation and general usability. This paper is a summary paper for a series that provides improvements through
- N2632. type inference for variable definitions (auto feature) and function return
- N2633. function literals and value closures
- N2634. type-generic lambdas (with auto parameters)
- N2635. lvalue closures (pseudo-references for captures)
The aim is to have a complete set of features that allows to easily specify and reuse type-generic code that can equally be used by applications or by library implementors. All this by remaining faithful to C’s efficient approach of static types and automatic (stack) allocation of local variables, by avoiding superfluous indirections and object aliasing, and by forcing no changes to existing ABI.
An overview of a paper that presents a reference implementation of a
defer mechanism (co-authored with Robert C. Seacord) has been accepted for publication at SAC’21. The full version is available as a research report on the HAL archive:
It introduces the implementation-side of a C language mechanism for error handling and deferred cleanup adapted from similar features in the Go programming language. Here is a simple example that uses such a feature:
void * const p = malloc(25);
if (!p) break;
void * const q = malloc(25);
if (!q) break;
if (mtx_lock(&mut)==thrd_error) break;
// all resources acquired
// use p, q, and mut until the end of the block
This mechanism improves the proximity, visibility, maintainability, robustness, and security of cleanup and error handling over existing language features. The library implementation of the features described by this paper is publicly available under an Open Source License at https://gustedt.gitlabpages.inria.fr/defer/.
This feature is under consideration for inclusion in the C Standard and has already been discussed on the last WG14 meeting. The main introduction can be found in a paper written together with Alex Gilding, Tom Scogland, Robert C. Seacord, Martin Uecker, and Freek Wiedijk:
A new research report describing shnell has now appeared on HAL:
We show how locally replaceable code snippets can be used to easily specify and prototype compiler and language enhancements for the C language that work by local source-to-source transformation. A toolbox implements the feature and provides many directives that can be used for compile time configuration and tuning, code unrolling, compile time expression evaluation and program modularization. The tool is also easily extensible by simple filters that can be programmed with any suitable text processing framework.